Ryanair 1879: Engine Failure, Window Loss & Partial Passenger Ejection

Ryanair FR1879 — Fault Tree Analysis | VibrationData
VIBRATIONDATA · INCIDENT ANALYSIS T. IRVINE · 11 JUL 2026

A fault tree for the July 10 uncontained engine failure over North Macedonia — and why one seatbelt turned a repeat of Southwest 1380 into an injury instead of a fatality.

FlightFR1879 · SKG→FMM
AircraftB737-800 · 9H-QEU
EngineCFM56-7B · No. 2 (RH)
Event Alt.≈15,000–16,000 ft
Outcome1 injured · safe return

The Incident

On the morning of Friday, July 10, 2026, Ryanair flight FR1879 — a Boeing 737-800 (registration 9H-QEU) operated by Ryanair Group subsidiary Malta Air — departed Thessaloniki, Greece, bound for Memmingen, Germany. Approximately six minutes after takeoff, climbing through roughly 15,000–16,000 ft over North Macedonia, the aircraft suffered an apparent uncontained failure of its right (No. 2) engine, a CFM International CFM56-7B.

Liberated debris struck the fuselage and shattered a passenger cabin window, causing rapid decompression. A 61-year-old Serbian passenger seated at the window was partially ejected — head and shoulders outside the aircraft — and was held in by his fastened seatbelt while fellow passengers and crew pulled him back inside. He was treated for friction burns and shock. Oxygen masks deployed, the crew executed an emergency descent to 6,000 ft, burned fuel for about 30 minutes, and landed safely back at Thessaloniki about one hour after departure.

Post-flight photos show extensive damage to the right engine: missing and damaged fan blades, a heavily damaged fan/booster section, and punctures in the cowling. Reporting from The Air Current indicates the window rupture was preceded by an apparent fan blade failure. The investigation is led by the Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation Committee of North Macedonia, supported by Greece’s HARSIA, the NTSB, the FAA, Boeing, and CFM.

Historical Precedents

Southwest 3472 (Aug 2016): CFM56-7B fan blade separated at the dovetail due to fatigue cracking; debris damaged the fuselage; no serious injuries.

Southwest 1380 (Apr 2018): fan blade No. 13 separated at the dovetail from a low-cycle fatigue crack; liberated inlet-cowl debris shattered a window, and a passenger was partially ejected and fatally injured.

Those events led to FAA airworthiness directives mandating ultrasonic and eddy-current inspections of CFM56-7B fan blade dovetails, plus a redesigned inlet to improve fragment containment. A key early question for FR1879: does the blade failure mode resemble the 2016/2018 dovetail cracking, and why did debris defeat the containment provisions?

Fault Tree

FIG. 1 — FAULT TREE, TOP EVENT & PRIMARY BRANCHESSTATUS: OPEN INVESTIGATION
TOP EVENT — Passenger injury via partial ejection through cabin window opening
AND
A · ReportedCabin window opening created in flight
B · ReportedCabin-to-ambient pressure differential present (normal pressurization — sets the ejection load, see calc)
C · ReportedPassenger seated immediately adjacent to opening — mitigated, not prevented, by fastened seatbelt
[A] Cabin window opening
OR
A1 · ReportedHigh-energy debris impact on window
A2 · PendingWindow pane fatigue / crazing failure
A3 · PendingWindow frame / retention hardware failure
A4 · PendingImproper window installation (ref. BA 5390 windscreen)
A1 — Debris impact on window
AND
A1a · ReportedEngine fragment(s) released — uncontained failure
A1b · ReportedFragment trajectory intersects window belt
A1c · ReportedFragment kinetic energy exceeds window impact capacity
A1a — Engine fragment release
AND
E1 · ReportedFan blade (or rotor stage) separation — per early reporting
E2 · ReportedContainment failure — debris exits nacelle
E1 — Fan blade separation
OR
E1a · PendingLCF crack at dovetail root (the SWA 3472 / 1380 mechanism)
E1b · PendingHCF from vibratory resonance or flutter — per-rev excitation crossing on the Campbell diagram
E1c · PendingForeign object damage / bird strike on takeoff
E1d · PendingManufacturing or material defect
E1e · PendingMissed or ineffective dovetail inspection (AD ultrasonic / eddy-current program)
E2 — Containment failure
OR
E2a · PendingFragment released forward of the fan containment case
E2b · PendingFragment energy above case containment capability
E2c · PendingSecondary debris: liberated inlet-cowl / nacelle structure — the actual window impactor in SWA 1380
Supported by current reporting Candidate branch — pending investigation

Subtlety from Southwest 1380: the object that broke the window was not the fan blade itself but a piece of inlet cowl liberated by the blade impact. Branch E2c may again prove to be the operative path — photos of 9H-QEU show a missing section of the right engine’s forward cowling.

The Ejection Load — Quick Estimate

At 16,000 ft, ambient pressure is about 7.97 psia. Early in the climb the 737’s outflow valve still holds the cabin near a low cabin altitude, so the differential was plausibly 3–4 psid (well below the ≈8 psid cruise differential of Southwest 1380 at FL320). A 737 cabin window opening is roughly 9 in × 12.5 in ≈ 112 in².

ΔP ≈ 3.5 psi  ·  A ≈ 112 in²
F ≈ (3.5 lbf/in²)(112 in²) ≈ 390 lbf initial expulsion load

The transient at pane loss is harsher still: local flow accelerates toward the orifice, and the ~250 kt slipstream drag then acts on any body part outside the mold line — hence the friction burns. The seatbelt converted this from a fatality into an injury. The differential decays within seconds as the cabin blows down toward ambient, which is why fellow passengers could then pull the man back inside.

Vibration & Fatigue Perspective

Fan blades live in a brutal dynamic environment: per-rev aerodynamic excitation from inlet distortion and wake interactions, potential flutter boundaries, and centrifugal mean stress that makes even modest vibratory alternating stress damaging at the dovetail contact, where fretting degrades fatigue capability. The 2016/2018 CFM56-7B events traced to fatigue cracking initiating at the dovetail — precisely the region targeted by the subsequent inspection ADs. Whether FR1879 repeats that mechanism, involves a different blade location, or traces to FOD will be a central investigation finding.

For the underlying methods — S-N fatigue, rainflow cycle counting, resonance, and shock response — see my free ebooks: blog.vibrationdata.com/toms-ebooks · vibrationdata.com

Sources

  • CNN — cnn.com/2026/07/10/travel/ryanair-passenger-sucked-out-plane-scli-intl
  • CBS News — cbsnews.com/news/man-sucked-out-ryanair-plane-window-greece-flight-witness-says/
  • The Air Current (fan blade failure reporting) — theaircurrent.com/feed/dispatches/engine-fan-blade-failure-preceded-rupture-ryanair-737-window-greece/
  • Flightradar24 blog (flight profile, engine damage) — flightradar24.com/blog/…/passenger-partially-sucked-out-of-ryanair-malta-air-737/
  • Le Monde — lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2026/07/11/man-nearly-sucked-out-of-detached-window-on-ryanair-flight_6755368_4.html
OPEN INVESTIGATION — this fault tree will be revised as North Macedonia AAIIC / HARSIA / NTSB findings emerge.
© 2026 Tom Irvine · VibrationData · vibrationdata.com

Leave a Comment